Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #518Re: Mach and nbuf.
From: Sherwood Botsford
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 21:45
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1992 21:45
28 lines
1531 bytes
1531 bytes
jake@skatter.usask.ca writes > I followed the thread about changing the kernel parameter 'nbuf' with > some interest, and probably incomplete understanding. I decided to > alter the number of buffers just to see what sort of difference it would > make. I used the bsd() sdmach nbuf=NNN command, rather than hack the > kernel. I understood that the command above would have to be re-entered > at every reboot, while the purpose of the hack was to make the change > permanent. However, I rebooted the machine to undo the change in > nbuf and to my suprise it came back up with the altered number of buffers. > > I mention this 1) to find out more about this behavior, and 2) to say that > doing it this way seems a lot easier than hacking the kernel. > The change only has to be re-entered if you power down the machine. The EPROM remembers the boot command last used, but is limited to a fairly short string, and a change in nbuf makes the string too long.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep9.214538.1146@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!access.usask.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!newsReferences:
<1992Aug28.034938.13638@access.usask.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!access.usask.ca!kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca!news From: sherwood@fenris.space.ualberta.ca (Sherwood Botsford) Subject: Re: Mach and nbuf. Message-ID: <1992Sep9.214538.1146@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca> Sender: news@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca Nntp-Posting-Host: fenris.space.ualberta.ca Organization: University Of Alberta, Edmonton Canada References: <1992Aug28.034938.13638@access.usask.ca> Distribution: USA Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1992 21:45:38 GMT Lines: 28