Re: PasteUp vs PageMaker vs Quark (RTF)

Article View: comp.sys.next.software

Article #582

Back to comp.sys.next.software Previous Next

#582

From: Jim De Arras
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 22:43

16 lines
1011 bytes

In article <1992Sep5.174919.29720@leland.Stanford.EDU> shiva@vega.Stanford.EDU  
(Marcos Javier Polanco) writes:
> 
> >Like a pink slip.  You are hurting your own company, Jack Reynolds!
> 
> I agree. If users had no choice then I'd make a face and still fork over  
> cash for PasteUp. Now I swear I will wait for Archetype and Pages to ship  
> their products. That's one lost sale!
> 
> -Marcos J. Polanco
> -shiva@vega.stanford.edu

If that's your criteria for choosing a personal tool, you will get what you  
deserve.

Jim De Arras

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep11.224304.22659@cube.handheld.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!clem!news

References: <1992Sep5.174919.29720@leland.Stanford.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!clem!news
From: jmd@cube.handheld.com (Jim De Arras)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Subject: Re: PasteUp vs PageMaker vs Quark (RTF)
Message-ID: <1992Sep11.224304.22659@cube.handheld.com>
Date: 11 Sep 92 22:43:04 GMT
References: <1992Sep5.174919.29720@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@cube.handheld.com
Organization: Hand Held Products, Inc.
Lines: 16
Nntp-Posting-Host: dale

Reply to Parent Message