Re: Praise and gripes about 3.0

Article View: comp.sys.next.software

Article #669

Back to comp.sys.next.software Previous Next

#669

From: andrew abernathy
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 1992 16:18

14 lines
1002 bytes

In article <1992Sep14.000247.27940@cs.sfu.ca> oneill@cs.sfu.ca (Richard  
O'Neill) writes:

> Well, I had to have the foresight to use the "Plan Upgrade" option and  
see
> that it planned on removing Icon because it wasn't part of 3.0. I said  
no
> to this, and so I still have my copy and can use it if/when I want to.

Dream on.  (As I did.)  Icon, unfortunately, is pretty much totally
broken under 3.0, at least PR2.  I'm pretty upset about it.

-- 
andrew_abernathy@wire.gwinnett.com (NeXTmail gleefully accepted)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep14.161853.3360@wire.gwinnett.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!emory!gwinnett!wire!andrew

References: <1992Sep14.000247.27940@cs.sfu.ca>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!emory!gwinnett!wire!andrew
From: andrew_abernathy@wire.gwinnett.com (andrew abernathy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Subject: Re: Praise and gripes about 3.0
Message-ID: <1992Sep14.161853.3360@wire.gwinnett.com>
Date: 14 Sep 92 16:18:53 GMT
Article-I.D.: wire.1992Sep14.161853.3360
References: <1992Sep14.000247.27940@cs.sfu.ca>
Sender: andrew@wire.gwinnett.com
Organization: or lack thereof
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message