Re: Praise and gripes about 3.0

Article View: comp.sys.next.software

Article #686

Back to comp.sys.next.software Previous Next

#686

From: Dave Griffiths
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 17:03

17 lines
1084 bytes

In article <1992Sep14.161853.3360@wire.gwinnett.com> andrew_abernathy@wire.gwinnett.com (andrew abernathy) writes:
>In article <1992Sep14.000247.27940@cs.sfu.ca> oneill@cs.sfu.ca (Richard  
>O'Neill) writes:
>
>> Well, I had to have the foresight to use the "Plan Upgrade" option and  
>see
>> that it planned on removing Icon because it wasn't part of 3.0. I said  
>no
>> to this, and so I still have my copy and can use it if/when I want to.
>
>Dream on.  (As I did.)  Icon, unfortunately, is pretty much totally
>broken under 3.0, at least PR2.  I'm pretty upset about it.
>

Why is Icon worse under 3.0? I thought 3.0 offered binary compatibility?

Dave Griffiths

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep15.170334.624@prim>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!prim!dave

References: <1992Sep14.000247.27940@cs.sfu.ca> <1992Sep14.161853.3360@wire.gwinnett.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!prim!dave
From: prim!dave@germany.eu.net (Dave Griffiths)
Subject: Re: Praise and gripes about 3.0
Message-ID: <1992Sep15.170334.624@prim>
Organization: Primitive Software Ltd.
References: <1992Sep14.000247.27940@cs.sfu.ca> <1992Sep14.161853.3360@wire.gwinnett.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1992 17:03:34 GMT
Lines: 17

Reply to Parent Message