Re: WordPerfect Development Continues

Article View: comp.sys.next.software

Article #807

Back to comp.sys.next.software Previous Next

#807

From: Randy Jackson
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 19:47

23 lines
1140 bytes

In article <1992Aug18.230341.28375@morrow.stanford.edu>  
hinds@cmgm.Stanford (Alexander Scott Hinds) writes:

....(.....)

> 
> I got burned by them when I purchased Amiga Wordperfect.  I won't make  
the  
> same mistake twice.  Naturally, this is just my opinion, not advice.
> 
> --X

Burned?  In what way?  And why transfer an Amiga-based policy to (all) 
other platforms?  

I was always happy with WP for DOS, and in spite of some deficiencies,
I am relatively pleased with WP for NeXT.  I recently purchased 
EquationBuilder, and find the two products work pretty well together to 
support my writing needs.

--
Randy Jackson
Ohio State Zooniversity

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug19.194749.2430@cgrg.ohio-state.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mane.cgrg.ohio-state.edu!news

References: <1992Aug18.230341.28375@morrow.stanford.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mane.cgrg.ohio-state.edu!news
From: randyj@randy.oac.osc.edu (Randy Jackson)
Subject: Re: WordPerfect Development Continues
Message-ID: <1992Aug19.194749.2430@cgrg.ohio-state.edu>
Sender: news@cgrg.ohio-state.edu (Usenet News Poster)
References: <1992Aug18.230341.28375@morrow.stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 19:47:49 GMT
Lines: 23

Reply to Parent Message