Review requested: EqB vs. Framemath

Article View: comp.sys.next.software

Article #863

Back to comp.sys.next.software Previous Next

#863

From: Anwar Mohammed
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1992 14:08

10 lines
1041 bytes

I have absolutely no doubt that Equation Builder would be better.  However,
I'd like to see a review posted.  Anyone?

-anwar
-- 
Anwar Mohammed                           Graduate Student
anwar+@cs.cmu.edu  (NeXTmail welcome)    School of Computer Science
Voice: +1 412 268 3043                   Carnegie-Mellon University
Fax:   +1 412 681 5739                   Pittsburgh, PA  15213-3890

Technical Details

Message-ID: <BtFwLM.GF5.2@cs.cmu.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!mips!darwin.sura.net!wupost!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!anwar

References: <BtAA6q.53p.2@cs.cmu.edu> <BtEIqq.AIq@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <BtFwCn.G8r.2@cs.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!mips!darwin.sura.net!wupost!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!anwar
From: anwar+@cs.cmu.edu (Anwar Mohammed)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Subject: Review requested: EqB vs. Framemath
Message-ID: <BtFwLM.GF5.2@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: 23 Aug 92 14:08:10 GMT
References: <BtAA6q.53p.2@cs.cmu.edu> <BtEIqq.AIq@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <BtFwCn.G8r.2@cs.cmu.edu>
Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System)
Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
Lines: 10
Nntp-Posting-Host: f.gp.cs.cmu.edu

Reply to Parent Message