🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.next.software
Article #865

Re: What's up with the "undo" command ?

#865
From: Gordon Van Huizen
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 20:04
26 lines
1525 bytes
In article <1992Nov3.171119.28740@leland.Stanford.EDU>  
peer@ccrma.stanford.edu (Peer Landa) writes:
> 
> The "undo" command doesn't work while using Edit, Mail and NewsGrazer in  
3.0 ??   
> Is it just me, or is this something everyone knows about and think is  
fine ?!   
> In the good old 2.0 days, Edit was my favorite text-editor, (did even  
use it  
> for wordprocessing . .) ..
> 

Well, undo in Edit has always been an "undelete" (which never thrilled me  
actually), and the NEXTSTEP 3.0 Edit has it labelled accordingly, along  
with removing command-Z.

I actually favor the change as I habitually command-Z to REALLY undo  
something and have on several ocassions been very badly screwed when the  
undelete occured...

Gordon
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gordon Van Huizen           vox: 619.488.9411  fax: 619.488.3045
Metrosoft                   gvh@metrosoft.com [NeXTmail welcome]
----------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Nov4.200410.2206@metrosoft.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!usc!rpi!psinntp!psinntp!hd0258!gvh
References: <1992Nov3.171119.28740@leland.Stanford.EDU>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!usc!rpi!psinntp!psinntp!hd0258!gvh
From: gvh@metrosoft.com (Gordon Van Huizen)
Subject: Re: What's up with the "undo" command ? 
Message-ID: <1992Nov4.200410.2206@metrosoft.com>
Sender: gvh@metrosoft.com
Reply-To: gvh@metrosoft.com (Gordon Van Huizen)
Organization: Metrosoft
References: <1992Nov3.171119.28740@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1992 20:04:10 GMT
Lines: 26