smail vs. 3.0

Article View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin

Article #1390

Back to comp.sys.next.sysadmin Previous Next

#1390

From: J.B. Nicholson-Owens
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 04:08

9 lines
843 bytes

Has anyone compiled and installed smail under 3.0?  I'm fed up with sendmail  
the sendmail config files, so I asked a bunch of people if there's anything  
nicer to deal with and they said 'smail'.  I've found a version that can use  
NetInfo stuff (3.1.28) but I cannot get it to compile under NeXTSTEP 3.0.

Thanks.
-- 
-- Jeff (jeffo@uiuc.edu)
-- NeXTmail welcome

Technical Details

Message-ID: <Bxou5t.IKr@news.cso.uiuc.edu>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!tulane!wupost!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!tulane!wupost!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet
From: jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)
Subject: smail vs. 3.0
Message-ID: <Bxou5t.IKr@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
Sender: usenet@news.cso.uiuc.edu (Net Noise owner)
Reply-To: jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 04:08:16 GMT
Lines: 9