Article View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Article #1791Re: bug in tar, anyone fixed it?
From: Zenon Fortuna
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 13:31
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 1992 13:31
17 lines
1172 bytes
1172 bytes
In article <1992Oct6.084806.10760@urz.unibas.ch> frank@ifi.unibas.ch writes: >In article <ti6ls.718300894@tuhhco> writes: >> As the man pages say "The current limit on file name length is 100 >characters." >> Has anyone fixed this bug? >> >/*****************************************************************************/ >> /* Ludger Solbach, AB Techn. Inf. VI, TU Hamburg-Harburg, Germany >YEP, GNU! get GNUtar... (it's all over the places, on many different servers) >-- >Robert Frank tel. + (061) 321 99 67 I do not understand the answer. The gnutar still has the default NAMSIZ set to (only ?) 100 characters. Maybe Robert thought about the path length ? -Z.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct6.133148.12377@resonex.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!decwrl!netcomsv!resonex!zenonReferences:
<ti6ls.718300894@tuhhco> <1992Oct6.084806.10760@urz.unibas.ch>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!decwrl!netcomsv!resonex!zenon From: zenon@resonex.com (Zenon Fortuna) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.sysadmin Subject: Re: bug in tar, anyone fixed it? Message-ID: <1992Oct6.133148.12377@resonex.com> Date: 6 Oct 92 13:31:48 GMT Article-I.D.: resonex.1992Oct6.133148.12377 References: <ti6ls.718300894@tuhhco> <1992Oct6.084806.10760@urz.unibas.ch> Organization: Resonex Inc., Sunnyvale CA Lines: 17