Re: Worm drives <==> NeXT

Article View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin

Article #599

Back to comp.sys.next.sysadmin Previous Next

#599

From: Scott Turner
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 01:26

10 lines
808 bytes

In article <c7VW02A.0fAb01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> kls30@duts.ccc.amdahl.com (Kent  
L Shephard) writes:
|> Why bother with a WORM (Write One Read Many) optical drive?
|> Just get a regular WMRM (Write Many Read Many) optical drive.
1. WORM media is less expensive.
2. WORM hardware is less expensive for equiv. capacity
3. WORM media is good for 100 years.
4. WORM data can't be modified.

Scotty

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Apr14.012627.12390@gagetalker.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!cmcl2!psinntp!psinntp!l5next!scotty

References: <c7VW02A.0fAb01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!yale.edu!cmcl2!psinntp!psinntp!l5next!scotty
From: scotty@gagetalker.com (Scott Turner)
Subject: Re: Worm drives <==> NeXT
Message-ID: <1992Apr14.012627.12390@gagetalker.com>
Sender: scotty@gagetalker.com
Organization: L5 Computing
References: <c7VW02A.0fAb01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1992 01:26:27 GMT
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message