Article View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Article #661Re: Chances of a 3.1 (was: Re: 3.0 SimpleNetworkStarter)
From: Walter C. Daugherity
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 18:22
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 18:22
16 lines
1359 bytes
1359 bytes
In article <Bu7yH7.KwD@news.cso.uiuc.edu> jeffo@uiuc.edu (J.B. Nicholson-Owens) writes: [lines deleted] | And someone said there probably wouldn't be a 3.1...somehow, I don't think | so. What other apps are buggy? Is there a definate chance or need for | 3.1 or are there workarounds that NeXT is telling it's users to use | instead? Of course there will be a 3.1 (or at least a 3.0a :-)). No matter how many beta testers, thousands of users banging on a system will uncover more bugs, which will then be fixed, given workarounds, or scheduled for 4.0 :-). -- Walter C. Daugherity Internet, NeXTmail: daugher@cs.tamu.edu Texas A & M University uucp: uunet!cs.tamu.edu!daugher College Station, TX 77843-3112 BITNET: DAUGHER@TAMVENUS ---Not an official document of Texas A&M---
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep7.182217.26779@tamsun.tamu.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!newsReferences:
<Bu7yH7.KwD@news.cso.uiuc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.sysadmin Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tamsun.tamu.edu!news From: daugher@cs.tamu.edu(Walter C. Daugherity) Subject: Re: Chances of a 3.1 (was: Re: 3.0 SimpleNetworkStarter) Message-ID: <1992Sep7.182217.26779@tamsun.tamu.edu> Keywords: of course Sender: news@tamsun.tamu.edu (Read News) Reply-To: daugher@cs.tamu.edu Organization: Texas A&M University, College Station References: <Bu7yH7.KwD@news.cso.uiuc.edu> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 18:22:17 GMT Lines: 16