Re: mach-task (grumble)

Article View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin

Article #76

Back to comp.sys.next.sysadmin Previous Next

#76

From: Matthew Dillon
Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1992 19:03

31 lines
1468 bytes

In article <1992Oct29.035859.26265@cronkite.ocis.temple.edu> ray@astro.ocis.temple.edu (Ray Lauff) writes:
>I contacted NeXT yesterday about this problem.  The person I spoke
>with kept me on hold for about 10 minutes and then told me that
>the processes were nothing to worry about and that I should just
>ignore them.
>
>Unfortunately, it's kinda hard to ignore the 300+ of them on
>my system and hard to ignore the slow system response time and
>hard to ignore the eventual system crash that results.

    Heiko sent me some email suggesting I try 'telnet localhost'. Indeed,
    this generates 3 hung mach processes every time I run it.

					    -Matt


>Ray
>ray@astro.temple.edu
>
>S.A.McIntyre@durham.ac.uk wrote:
>> why so many and what can be done about it or is this just another 3.0
>> feature?
>>
>> Scott

--

    Matthew Dillon		dillon@Overload.Berkeley.CA.US
    1005 Apollo Way		uunet.uu.net!overload!dillon
    Incline Village, NV. 89451	ham: KC6LVW (no mail drop)
    USA 			Sandel-Avery Engineering (702)831-8000

Technical Details

Message-ID: <dillon.0qok@overload.Berkeley.CA.US>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!overload!dillon

References: <Bw61Ho.DGs@newcastle.ac.uk> <1992Oct29.035859.26265@cronkite.ocis.temple.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!overload!dillon
From: dillon@overload.Berkeley.CA.US (Matthew Dillon)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Subject: Re:  mach-task (grumble)
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <dillon.0qok@overload.Berkeley.CA.US>
References:  <Bw61Ho.DGs@newcastle.ac.uk> <1992Oct29.035859.26265@cronkite.ocis.temple.edu>
Date: 1 Nov 92 11:03:05 PST
Organization: Not an Organization
Lines: 32

Reply to Parent Message