Article View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Article #887Re: What's a better block size for a Fuji 520M drive?
From: Jay Finger
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 23:18
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 23:18
18 lines
1712 bytes
1712 bytes
In article <1992Aug17.182637.9116@leland.Stanford.EDU> m@crito.stanford.edu (M Carling) writes: >Not only for this Fujitsu, but for all SCSI hard drives, 1024 byte blocks >are better than (or in a few cases as good as) 512 byte blocks. The reason >is that the filesystem writes files in increments of 1K. Thus if the disk >is formatted to 512, blocks get used in pairs. There is an overhead cost >to be paid for this. Formatting the drive to 1024 byte blocks may yield a >capacity increase of up to 5%, and a performance increase smaller than >that. Will the NeXT support sector sizes greater than 1024 bytes? Since the sd driver reads/writes 8K chunks, might one find even better performance with 8K sectors? -- =============================================================================== Jay Finger - finger@convex.com | Convex Computer Corp CONVEX System Integration and Support | 3000 Waterview Parkway Product Specialist | Richardson, TX 75083
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug18.231820.948@convex.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!convex!fingerReferences:
<59698@mimsy.umd.edu> <1992Aug17.182637.9116@leland.Stanford.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!convex!finger
From: finger@convex.com (Jay Finger)
Subject: Re: What's a better block size for a Fuji 520M drive?
Message-ID: <1992Aug18.231820.948@convex.com>
Sender: usenet@convex.com (news access account)
Nntp-Posting-Host: mikey.convex.com
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
References: <59698@mimsy.umd.edu> <1992Aug17.182637.9116@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 23:18:20 GMT
X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer
Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and
not necessarily those of CONVEX.
Lines: 18