🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Article #933

Re: What's a better block size for a Fuji 520M drive?

#933
From: Paul S. Sears
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 18:35
33 lines
1966 bytes
In article <1992Aug19.013435.15349@leland.Stanford.EDU> m@crito.stanford.edu  
(M Carling) writes:
=>In article <1992Aug18.231820.948@convex.com> finger@convex.com (Jay  
=>Finger) writes:
=>> Will the NeXT support sector sizes greater than 1024 bytes?  Since the  
=>sd
=>> driver reads/writes 8K chunks, might one find even better performance  
=>with
=>> 8K sectors?
=>
=>If the disk could do it, and the computer could do it, 8K blocks would be  
=>faster (not much) and increase capacity (again not much). But unless you  
=>have just a few files each of which is quite large, that is not an  
=>efficient way to use space. Also, I don't know of any drives which support  
=>8K blocks. NeXT's current software supports 512 byte or 1024 byte blocks,  
=>and I haven't heard anything that would suggest that they are considering  
=>changing that.
=>

Actually, the NeXT also supports 2048 byte blocks/sectors as that is what the  
CD-Rom has for a sector size...

=>M Carling
=>Director, Bay Area NeXT Group
=>--

--
Paul S. Sears                *  sears@uh.edu (NeXT Mail OK)
The University of Houston    *  suggestions@tree.egr.uh.edu (NeXT
Engineering Computing Center *  comments, complaints, questions)
NeXT System Administration   *  DoD#1967 '83 NightHawk 650SC 
          >>> SSI Diving Certification #755020059 <<<
"Programming is like sex: One mistake and you support it a lifetime."
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Aug19.183555.3981@menudo.uh.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!usenet
References: <1992Aug19.013435.15349@leland.Stanford.EDU>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!usenet
From: sears@tree.egr.uh.edu (Paul S. Sears)
Subject: Re: What's a better block size for a Fuji 520M drive?
Message-ID: <1992Aug19.183555.3981@menudo.uh.edu>
Sender: usenet@menudo.uh.edu (USENET News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: sierra.egr.uh.edu
Reply-To: sears@tree.egr.uh.edu
Organization: University of Houston
References: <1992Aug19.013435.15349@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 18:35:55 GMT
Lines: 33