Re: NextStep 3.0 on 8M/105+105 system?

Article View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin

Article #974

Back to comp.sys.next.sysadmin Previous Next

#974

From: M Carling
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 18:26

16 lines
1029 bytes

In article <1992Aug20.160704.26753@Princeton.EDU> js@courant.princeton.edu  
(Jay Sekora) writes:
> Hoping this isn't something that's been discussed before.
> 
> I have an 8M/105 25MHz '040 system, with another external 105M drive,
> running 2.1.  Needless to say, it's a bit slow, but I'm a patient
> person.

I am running 3.0 on an 8/250 system. It is a bit slower than 2.1, but the  
improvement in functionality justifies it. It is possible to build a  
minimal 3.0 system on a 105 drive.

M Carling
Director, Bay Area NeXT Group
--
I believe George Bush, Anita Hill, and Pinocchio.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Aug20.182655.21624@leland.Stanford.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news

References: <1992Aug20.160704.26753@Princeton.EDU>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!leland.Stanford.EDU!news
From: m@crito.stanford.edu (M Carling)
Subject: Re: NextStep 3.0 on 8M/105+105 system?
Message-ID: <1992Aug20.182655.21624@leland.Stanford.EDU>
Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
Organization: DSO, Stanford University
References: <1992Aug20.160704.26753@Princeton.EDU>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 92 18:26:55 GMT
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message