🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Thread View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
2 messages
2 total messages Started by Bradley Head Thu, 23 Jul 1992 06:50
Fax dial out numbers with 70# ?
#193
Author: Bradley Head
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1992 06:50
19 lines
1331 bytes
Does anyone have a workaround that allows one to insert *70 or 70# 
into stored fax numbers (in your ~Library/Fax/numbers.txt file)? I need to
disable call-alert service and 7011 inserted does not work as a 
substitute for 70# here. (70# is what disables our call-alert). 

The telephone number filtering/parsing in the Fax software is a little too 
aggressive as is and will not send the fax/modem ATDT70#555-5555, as I  
would like it to. Who wrote this shit anyway? - certainly couldn't have  
been NeXT - my guess is they hurriedly licensed some shit code from an  
unnamed third party in a flailing attempt to add fax support to 2.0. I  
sure hope they fix this in 3.0. Seamless my ass!

Thanks in advance

...brad
-- 
Bradley Head, bhead@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca (NeXTmail :-)
InStep Mobile Communications Inc., Vancouver, BC CANADA
Re: Fax dial out numbers with 70# ?
#228
Author: simsong Simson L. Garfinkel
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1992 12:26
35 lines
1888 bytes
SBook version 2.3 will automatically export the fax numbers to NeXT's FAX list.   
Then, in your preferences, you can tell it so that phone numbers should be  
dialed with a "70#" as a prefix.

No problem!

For information on how to order SBook, send email to:

	orders@next.cambridge.ma.us


In article <1992Jul23.065036.6333@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca>  
bhead@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca (Bradley Head) writes:
> 
> Does anyone have a workaround that allows one to insert *70 or 70# 
> into stored fax numbers (in your ~Library/Fax/numbers.txt file)? I need to
> disable call-alert service and 7011 inserted does not work as a 
> substitute for 70# here. (70# is what disables our call-alert). 
> 
> The telephone number filtering/parsing in the Fax software is a little too 
> aggressive as is and will not send the fax/modem ATDT70#555-5555, as I  
> would like it to. Who wrote this shit anyway? - certainly couldn't have  
> been NeXT - my guess is they hurriedly licensed some shit code from an  
> unnamed third party in a flailing attempt to add fax support to 2.0. I  
> sure hope they fix this in 3.0. Seamless my ass!
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> ...brad
> -- 
> Bradley Head, bhead@hfs.questor.wimsey.bc.ca (NeXTmail :-)
> InStep Mobile Communications Inc., Vancouver, BC CANADA
-- 

................................................................simson
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads