Thread View: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
1 messages
1 total messages
Started by Kennedy Lemke
Thu, 20 Aug 1992 18:37
"webster" copyright?
Author: Kennedy Lemke
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 18:37
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 18:37
63 lines
3178 bytes
3178 bytes
I recently ftp'ed code for webster and websterd with eyes toward installing these programs in our heterogeneous UNIX environment. In the process of obtaining the BTREE and LIBTEXT libraries as per the documentation (to get the "thesaurus" aspect of the program working), I received the following comments from a representative from NeXT: > Note: Also, I must tell you that using any software to extract > Websters definitions or Thesaurus entries from a non-NeXT > machine is a violation of the Webster's copyright and an > infringement of the NeXT Software License Agreement. > > > Merriam-Websters is concerned about an abuse of their copyright > and have expressed a willingness to license it's use on a > royalty-bearing basis. Here is how they can be contacted for > further information: > > Merriam-Webster, Inc. > 47 Federal Street > P.O. Box 281 > Springfield, MA 01102 > Attention: Jim Withgott, Vice President The above is not a legal statement, obviously, but it certainly informs me of a possible legal problem. I hope someone can help me with a couple questions about this: (1) Is this policy a well-known fact? Does anyone know more about this? Has anyone written the company (Webster) asked about this or perhaps even licensed the use of the "webster" program on non-next machines? (2) There was no mention of this in the webster sources (or the NeXT faq list) that I saw, so what can I imply from this? (a) Can I run webster on all our UNIX platforms because the program that is actually extracting information (websterd) is running on a NeXT? (b) Can I run websterd on a NeXT and run webster on all our other NeXTs but not on any other UNIX platforms? (c) Would it be OK (legal), for example, to use scenario (b) just above, and then on all other non-NeXT UNIX machines have "webster" be a one-line shell script that does: "rsh somenextmachine webster $*"? Or would this still be considered a violation? I know that I cannot expect complete and accurate answers based on the non-legal information from NeXT that I included above, but I would appreciate hearing some comments/discussion, especially from anyone who knows more about this or perhaps has contacted Merriam-Websters. Please send email rather than posting followups, and I'll post a summary to these groups. Kennedy Lemke Network and UNIX Systems Administrator Postmaster Matsushita Information Technology Laboratory 182 Nassau Street, Third Floor Princeton, New Jersey 08542 Work Phone: (609) 497-4600 Fax Phone: (609) 497-4013 Email: lemke@MITL.COM
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads