Article View: comp.sys.novell
Article #7755replies: reasons for buying certified servers
From: Dan Sorenson
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1992 22:10
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1992 22:10
89 lines
5207 bytes
5207 bytes
Well, it's been a week, so I'm posting snippets of e-mail I received on the question of purchasing Novell certified machines for file servers. The concise summary is that Novell support is nil unless it's certified, but a local dealer may be able to support his non-certified machine well enough. BEGIN SUMMARY OF MAIL -- I will ALWAYS buy Novell Certified equipment in the future. I have had a problem that has been going on for 5 months; clearly, Novell support was needed. Novell began working on the problem for a week or so until one of the techs said "By the way, what kind of NIC is in the server?". When I told him what it was, he looked it up and told me it was not certified. He then said "I can no longer work on your problem; put a certified card in the server, get the problem to repeat and then maybe we will look at it again." So I got a certified card, got the problem to repeat and called Novell. They began working on it again - for a couple of weeks. Then one day the tech said "Hey, I just realized your server is not Novell certified; I can no longer work on your problem. Get a certified server, get the problem to repeat and then maybe we will look at it again." So now all my hardware (in this problem) is certified anyway, and Novell will talk to me. It is not clear that non-certified equipment is causing the problem, but at least they talk to me. And the saddest part was that weeks were wasting because Novell didn't bother checking that it was all certified to begin with. By the way, Novell techs are very good; they will coordinate with the vendors (of certified equipment) so you deal only with Novell, not 7 different vendors of cards, PCs, hubs ,etc. Novell will go to the ends of the earth to solve a problem -- if your certified. Local support is great - but it doesn't help if the problem is a software one. Spend the money, save the time and aggrivation. It's not pleasant facing an angry mob of net users... __ a) you pay for it, one way or another b) especially with mainstream types of machines, there's no real problem. c) the certification tests only a single configuration and does *NOT* test integration of say, a Zenith box with a Maxdor drive. -- I wouldn't go with anything but a Novell certified server. -- Lets just suppose that you have a problem with your server and/or network. When you call Novell Technical Support they are going to ask you about the error, the configuration, what brought on the error, etc. They might ask you to update drivers and software. If the problem appears to be hardware related and you do not have certified hardware they will ask you to swap out the non-certified hardware for certified hardware. If you cannot or will not do this there is not much chance that they can do anything for you. Novell technicians cannot duplicate problems with non-certified hardware. As far as a support stand point goes, get the certified hardware. It will save you grief in the future. In fact look for certified hardware from vendors that are members of the Technical Support Alliance (TSA). This will insure that the hardware vendor has a technical support relation ship with Novell and other hardware and software vendors. -- Until my server was certified, Novell would often abandon a wierd problem blaming it on the server and its lack of certification. All my servers are certified so Novell can't cop quite so easily. ___ [note: Bob referrs to my mythical Bob's Computers outlet] It depends does Bob have a bunch of the same machines out being used as file servers. If Bob is experienced in Novell and is already using his machines as servers I wouldn't worry. So get references from Bob's customers, and if they love his noname servers, there may be a reason. -- END SUMMARY OF MAIL Thanks to all who replied. We're going with the certified server since it only costs $40 more than the non-certified. You would not believe the hoops I've had to jump through to get this approved! Apparently support isn't considered a financial issue... <Dan Sorenson, z1dan@exnet.iastate.edu, viking@iastate.edu, DoD #1066> < Iowa State University and I have agreed to disagree on most things.> < The problem with the Danegeld is that the Danes keep coming back. >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<viking.708387022@vincent1.iastate.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!vincent1.iastate.edu!vikingShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fe659,fd006ef59bdfdee0,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfe659,public X-Google-Thread: 10f035,fd006ef59bdfdee0,start X-Google-Attributes: gid10f035,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-06-12 08:09:44 PST Newsgroups: comp.sys.novell,bit.listserv.novell Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!vincent1.iastate.edu!viking From: viking@iastate.edu (Dan Sorenson) Subject: replies: reasons for buying certified servers Message-ID: <viking.708387022@vincent1.iastate.edu> Summary: That's sort of what this is. Keywords: certified, summary, replies Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System) Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA Date: Fri, 12 Jun 1992 22:10:22 GMT Lines: 90