Re: 32036 ???

Article View: comp.sys.nsc.32k

Article #1055

#1055

From: Michael Bloom
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1986 00:39

10 lines
974 bytes

In article <3413@sdcrdcf.UUCP> doon@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Harry W. Reed) writes:

>	While reading my latest copy of UNIX REVIEW I saw an add for a
>UNIX box that boasted a 32036 NSC CPU. It may be a typo but does anybody

In the same ad they also claim "code compatibility with the vax".  Is this
just ad hype for "source code compatibility"? Or are they talking about
binary compatibility, which would imply a custom masked chip?

- Michael Bloom

Technical Details

Message-ID: <203@ttidca.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!ttidca!mb

References: <3413@sdcrdcf.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!ttidca!mb
From: mb@ttidca.UUCP (Michael Bloom)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Subject: Re: 32036 ???
Message-ID: <203@ttidca.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 9-Nov-86 19:39:21 EST
Article-I.D.: ttidca.203
Posted: Sun Nov  9 19:39:21 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 18-Nov-86 00:52:41 EST
References: <3413@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Reply-To: mb@ttidca.UUCP (The  of all Evil)
Organization: CitiCorp TTI, Santa Monica, Ca.
Lines: 10
Summary: might be a custom chip

Reply to Parent Message