Re: 32036 ???

Article View: comp.sys.nsc.32k

Article #1058

#1058

From: J.S.Shapiro
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 1986 07:29

4 lines
789 bytes

They may have meant 32032 or 32132 or 32532, all of which are members (if I
remember the numbers right) of the NSC processor family. These are not
binary compatible with the VAX, but the architecture is essentially very
similar.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <864@sfsup.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!mit-eddie!rutgers!princeton!allegra!ulysses!sfmag!sfsup!shap

References: <3413@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <275@percival.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!cmcl2!yale!husc6!mit-eddie!rutgers!princeton!allegra!ulysses!sfmag!sfsup!shap
From: shap@sfsup.UUCP (J.S.Shapiro)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Subject: Re: 32036 ???
Message-ID: <864@sfsup.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 25-Nov-86 02:29:52 EST
Article-I.D.: sfsup.864
Posted: Tue Nov 25 02:29:52 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 25-Nov-86 10:02:06 EST
References: <3413@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <275@percival.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T Information Systems, Summit N.J.
Lines: 4

Reply to Parent Message