Article View: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Article #1082Coprocessor protocol(s)/interface
From: Robert Daasch
Date: Tue, 05 May 1987 15:48
Date: Tue, 05 May 1987 15:48
29 lines
1658 bytes
1658 bytes
As suggested I am reposting this to a broader set of newsgroups; ======== I would be interested in expanding the recent series on "on-chip or off-chip MMU" to coprocessors and the "ideal protocol?" Here at PSU we are working on a IC subsystem (MOSIS CMOS etc.) for supporting the 020 protocol. I think it is fair to say that it is based on a notion that a coprocessor is a special purpose peripheral that shares code (operands etc. are inline with the 020 instructions). I don't know details but I believe Intel doesn't use this scheme with the 386. Questions to get started could be: 1) How is the coprocessor limited (both hardware and software ) by the protocol? 2) Is there a reasonable sized "set of protocols" that would support a broad spectrum of coprocessors? 3) What coprocessors are going to be needed? This would get away from rehashing FPU, MMU and the like. Reply to ...!tektronix!psu-cs!psueea!daasch or post and I'll gladly collect an archive. Thanks, Rob D. ...!tektronix!psu-cs!psueea!daasch daasch@portland.csnet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<413@psueea.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!psu-cs!psueea!daaschShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tektronix!reed!psu-cs!psueea!daasch From: daasch@psueea.UUCP (Robert Daasch) Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k,comp.sys.intel,comp.sys.m68k Subject: Coprocessor protocol(s)/interface Message-ID: <413@psueea.UUCP> Date: Tue, 5-May-87 11:48:20 EDT Article-I.D.: psueea.413 Posted: Tue May 5 11:48:20 1987 Date-Received: Thu, 7-May-87 07:15:27 EDT Distribution: na Organization: Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Portland State University; Portland OR Lines: 29