Article View: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Article #1090Re: ICM 3216 (really death of 320**)
From: Roger Thompson
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1987 18:38
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1987 18:38
19 lines
1467 bytes
1467 bytes
In article <16647@sun.uucp>, chuq%plaid@Sun.COM (Chuq Von Rospach) writes: > > I almost hate to step into this argument, since people seem to be having > quite enough fun without me, but I'd suggest people look at the number of > companies that USED to use the NS32xxx chips as well as those that still do. > The ratio is interesting. > When in the course of human events ---- oh, wrong subject. What ratio are you interested in ---- I have several. Our total design win base is increasing, our revenue (thats the good stuff) is doing real well, our backlog is solid. Yes, there have been lost accounts -- National is not immune to that. Intel and moto and even Sun have had similar situations. That is life in the big world. Our compounded annual growth rate is at 33%, not bad when you consider the microprocessor market average is around 25%. ------ roger
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4208@nsc.nsc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!pyramid!hplabs!nsc!rogerReferences:
<1775@a.cs.okstate.edu> <139@unsvax.UUCP> <1170@encore.UUCP> <16647@sun.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-lcc!pyramid!hplabs!nsc!roger From: roger@nsc.nsc.com (Roger Thompson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k Subject: Re: ICM 3216 (really death of 320**) Message-ID: <4208@nsc.nsc.com> Date: Tue, 14-Apr-87 13:38:40 EST Article-I.D.: nsc.4208 Posted: Tue Apr 14 13:38:40 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 19-Apr-87 04:38:28 EST References: <1775@a.cs.okstate.edu> <139@unsvax.UUCP> <1170@encore.UUCP> <16647@sun.uucp> Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale Lines: 19 Keywords: Come on now.