Article View: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Article #1127Re: NS32000 Processor
From: Renu Raman
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1987 16:20
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1987 16:20
29 lines
1749 bytes
1749 bytes
>Great blurb on the 32k, why'd you leave us big endder's out tho?
>32032's power two different parallel processing powerhouses:
>Encore Mutimax series
>Sequent (I think)
>Wonder why the 32k was chosen to be the base unit in multi processor
>computer's? Probably because the other's couldn't handle the job!
True. Until recently only NS 32Ks were used in shared memory multis
but times have changed. Sequent's recent Multiprocessor is based
on 80386(yuk!) and claim a 81 MIPS (24 processor Balance 21000 is 21 Mips)
rating (If at all you beleive in MIPS rating - I don't)
They use 32 386s in a shared memory environment.
Here comes my question. Like it or not shared memory multis are here
to stay (uniprocessor power is saturating). Why don't the big three,
like the transputer provide extra communication channels.
Like-wise semaphore and instructions to support access of shared data
will be an important feature if these processors are to be used in
shared memort multis.
>rhealey@ub.d.umn.edu
>----------
Renu Raman UUCP:...ihnp4!nucsrl!ram
1410 Chicago Ave., #505 ARPA:ram@eecs.nwu.edu
Evanston IL 60201 AT&T:(312)-869-4276
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3630001@nucsrl.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-spam!mordor!lll-tis!ptsfa!ihnp4!chinet!nucsrl!ramReferences:
<266@udcps1.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-spam!mordor!lll-tis!ptsfa!ihnp4!chinet!nucsrl!ram From: ram@nucsrl.UUCP (Renu Raman) Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k Subject: Re: NS32000 Processor Message-ID: <3630001@nucsrl.UUCP> Date: Tue, 9-Jun-87 12:20:00 EDT Article-I.D.: nucsrl.3630001 Posted: Tue Jun 9 12:20:00 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jun-87 05:45:40 EDT References: <266@udcps1.UUCP> Organization: Northwestern U, Evanston IL, USA Lines: 29