Article View: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Article #128Re: A better CRC routine
From: Bruce Culbertson
Date: Fri, 04 May 1990 16:59
Date: Fri, 04 May 1990 16:59
17 lines
1288 bytes
1288 bytes
When I implemented the monitor download command, I considered the various popular CRC codes. I chose the one I did because I thought it was compatible with both Minix and CCITT. CCITT is definitely the wave of the future -- the organizations behind it have far more clout than the people using CRC16. I am disappointed to hear that the Minix people blew it when they implemented their CRC -- that it is not really CCITT. My preference, however, is to try to convince them to fix their code and bring it into conformance. By the way, does anyone know what POSIX specifies for the "sum" command? Is there a POSIX "crc" command? I used a bit serial algorithm to save ROM space (no table required) and because download time was dominated by the serial port throughput. I like the small table size used by the posted CRC16 routine. Bruce Culbertson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9005041659.AA01106@hplwbc.HPL.HP.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!bionet!ames!vsi1!daver!bungi.com!newsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!bionet!ames!vsi1!daver!bungi.com!news From: culberts@hplwbc.hpl.hp.com (Bruce Culbertson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k,alt.sys.pc532 Subject: Re: A better CRC routine Message-ID: <9005041659.AA01106@hplwbc.HPL.HP.COM> Date: 4 May 90 16:59:01 GMT Sender: news@daver.bungi.com Distribution: comp Lines: 17 Approved: news@daver.bungi.com