Article View: comp.sys.nsc.32k
Article #41FPU Overflow
From: Robert A. Agnew
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1989 16:04
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1989 16:04
3 lines
563 bytes
563 bytes
The 32k FPU status word has a trap enable for underflow and inexact result. Do either of these fileds control trapping on overflow or does floating overflow always cause a trap?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<528@trwrc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-sdd!trwrc!agnewShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-sdd!trwrc!agnew From: agnew@trwrc.UUCP (Robert A. Agnew) Newsgroups: comp.sys.nsc.32k Subject: FPU Overflow Keywords: NS32000 FPU Overflow Message-ID: <528@trwrc.UUCP> Date: 12 Jul 89 16:04:17 GMT Organization: TRW-MEAD, San Diego, Ca. Lines: 3