🚀 go-pugleaf

pc532@bungi.com writes:
 > In <920724120859.111bf@hfrd.dsto.gov.au> DALL@hfrd.dsto.GOV.AU writes:
 > 
 > >In case I gave the wrong impression, there is a PC532 mach and it works.
 > >There isn't a *licence free* pc532 mach *server*.
 > 
 > Which brings us to the obvious questions:  Where is this PC532 Mach available?
 > What MK level is it up to?

I'm running MK77 UX37 now. Note that (at least my system) is a bit short
of what I would consider "stable".

 > It sounds as though it's progressed a bit beyond what the HUT guys did with
 > it.

They are continuing to work on it.

 > Last time we spoke to them they didn't want to release it (that _was_
 > quite some time ago).
 > Does it support the 6250 controller?

Both scsi chips are supported (at the moment the 6250 driver is more advanced
than the dp8350 driver).

I would want to check with JVH first but I could make *differences*
available for ftp. I think he wanted to get the 532 support submitted
to CMU before it becomes widely distributed. Making use of the diffs
would still require you having supped MK77 and UX37 from cmu, the
latter (still) requires an AT&T source licence.

Be warned, that the whole thing is still not really very stable, nor
is it easy to build/install/boot. Unless you are interested in doing
some debugging, it is still not really "ready".

Having said that, if you do have a source licence and you are
interested and capable of doing kernel work, the more people working
on it the better!

Ian