🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #1097

Re: Apple?

#1097
From: Jeff Halverson
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 1995 19:50
44 lines
2912 bytes
docjoe@interramp.com (Joe Ragosta) wrote:
>In article <40lfch$lfn@eken.hv.se>, henke@hv.se wrote:

>Wrong. Macs and UNIX are better for different things. I have a business to
>run. Productivity is worth real money. Why should I screw around trying to
>teach all the secretaries, clerks, sales people, etc UNIX when MacOS is
>easy for them to use? Even Windows costs more than MacOS from a training /
>support perspective. UNIX would be even more.
>

Have you ever seen a professional secretary use the DOS version of WordPerfect,
then compared it to one that uses either Mac or Windows version?  The people who
have learned on a GUI-type system will invariably use the handicap of the mouse,
and the cute button, and slow down their productivity.  Yes--I know-- it is harder
and it takes more time to invest in learning a quicker system and all the shortcut
keys--but if you put in an initial investment, your short-term losses will turn
into your long-term gains.   I don't know about other countries, but I believe that
it the achilies heel of American bussiness--Don't invest in long-term,  just get
the profits _now_!  (Government is the worst offender of this.)

Do your business a favor, and invest in it.


>
>Before you continue your flames, I'll say I believe PMT is better than
>CMT. However, MacOS's choice of CMT is adequate for the majority of users
>today.
>

There. You have said it again.  I'm fearful of your short-term goals.  "MacOS's
choice of CMT is adequate for the majority of users today."  Note, that you used
the word "today".  What about tommorow?  Look ahead.  --Sure, I've heard it all
one thousand times-- "MacOS will have it--wait for Copland."  To be honest, I'd
rather have a well tested model that has been in existance for a while.

(Has anyone bought those DOC-Martin sandles?  What made them think they were in the
sandle business anyways?  I know two people who bought them, and the buckles broke.
If you buy sandles, stick with the Berkenstocks.)
  

>-- 
>Regards, Joe Ragosta -- 100% Chemical and proud of it.

Jeff Halverson
Technical Details
Message-ID: <DDDB2q.658@news.cis.umn.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!umn.edu!news
References: <DCywsM.2H5@inesc.pt> <40lfch$lfn@eken.hv.se> <docjoe-1408951623560001@ip139.wilmington.de.interramp.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!umn.edu!news
From: Jeff Halverson <halv0019@gold.tc.umn.edu>
Subject: Re: Apple?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Message-ID: <DDDB2q.658@news.cis.umn.edu>
Sender: news@news.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration)
Nntp-Posting-Host: dialup-1-38.gw.umn.edu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: Ika Pon Pon
References: <DCywsM.2H5@inesc.pt> <40lfch$lfn@eken.hv.se> <docjoe-1408951623560001@ip139.wilmington.de.interramp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 1995 19:50:11 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K)
X-Url: news:docjoe-1408951623560001@ip139.wilmington.de.interramp.com