Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #1097Re: Apple?
From: Jeff Halverson
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 1995 19:50
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 1995 19:50
44 lines
2912 bytes
2912 bytes
docjoe@interramp.com (Joe Ragosta) wrote: >In article <40lfch$lfn@eken.hv.se>, henke@hv.se wrote: >Wrong. Macs and UNIX are better for different things. I have a business to >run. Productivity is worth real money. Why should I screw around trying to >teach all the secretaries, clerks, sales people, etc UNIX when MacOS is >easy for them to use? Even Windows costs more than MacOS from a training / >support perspective. UNIX would be even more. > Have you ever seen a professional secretary use the DOS version of WordPerfect, then compared it to one that uses either Mac or Windows version? The people who have learned on a GUI-type system will invariably use the handicap of the mouse, and the cute button, and slow down their productivity. Yes--I know-- it is harder and it takes more time to invest in learning a quicker system and all the shortcut keys--but if you put in an initial investment, your short-term losses will turn into your long-term gains. I don't know about other countries, but I believe that it the achilies heel of American bussiness--Don't invest in long-term, just get the profits _now_! (Government is the worst offender of this.) Do your business a favor, and invest in it. > >Before you continue your flames, I'll say I believe PMT is better than >CMT. However, MacOS's choice of CMT is adequate for the majority of users >today. > There. You have said it again. I'm fearful of your short-term goals. "MacOS's choice of CMT is adequate for the majority of users today." Note, that you used the word "today". What about tommorow? Look ahead. --Sure, I've heard it all one thousand times-- "MacOS will have it--wait for Copland." To be honest, I'd rather have a well tested model that has been in existance for a while. (Has anyone bought those DOC-Martin sandles? What made them think they were in the sandle business anyways? I know two people who bought them, and the buckles broke. If you buy sandles, stick with the Berkenstocks.) >-- >Regards, Joe Ragosta -- 100% Chemical and proud of it. Jeff Halverson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<DDDB2q.658@news.cis.umn.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!umn.edu!newsReferences:
<DCywsM.2H5@inesc.pt> <40lfch$lfn@eken.hv.se> <docjoe-1408951623560001@ip139.wilmington.de.interramp.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!umn.edu!news From: Jeff Halverson <halv0019@gold.tc.umn.edu> Subject: Re: Apple? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Message-ID: <DDDB2q.658@news.cis.umn.edu> Sender: news@news.cis.umn.edu (Usenet News Administration) Nntp-Posting-Host: dialup-1-38.gw.umn.edu Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Ika Pon Pon References: <DCywsM.2H5@inesc.pt> <40lfch$lfn@eken.hv.se> <docjoe-1408951623560001@ip139.wilmington.de.interramp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 15 Aug 1995 19:50:11 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1N (Macintosh; I; 68K) X-Url: news:docjoe-1408951623560001@ip139.wilmington.de.interramp.com