Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #1127Re: Prices and questions about direction of PPC hardware
From: Joe Ragosta
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 12:20
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 12:20
43 lines
2893 bytes
2893 bytes
In article <40pccd$61p@bug.rahul.net>, Bill Moyer <ttk@rahul.net> wrote: > > Tangentally related to the subject above is the question of why > PowerPC system hardware is so expensive. The CPU itself is rela- > tively inexpensive, but the surrounding hardware is outrageous. > I was hoping to see hardware come out which was similar to what's > available for PC's today -- ~$200 motherboard, with bus slots for > standard peripherals and SIMM slots for memory, modest BIOS ROMs, > L2 cache extension sockets, and a dedicated plug for the keyboard. > When I heard about the PPC-specific support circuit Motorola put > on a single die, I was thrilled. I thought that surely this would > make PPC motherboards even less expensive.. Actually, it IS less expensive. The problem is that you're comparing Apples and Oranges. Look at name brand computers. (See my post on comp.sys.mac.advocacy). ComputerWorld printed a table showing various configurations from Apple, Compaq, and IBM. The PowerMacs were 8-28% less expensive than the comparable PCs. That doesn't even factor in that the PowerMacs were faster, had CD-ROM (not included in the PCs AFAIK), and several had advanced AV features. If you consider that these companies have similar cost structure (actually Compaq R&D is probably lower than the other two), and similar profitability (I believe Apple gross margins were actually higher), the difference is probably related to the cost of assembling a system. The reason it LOOKS like PPC is more expensive is that you don't have a significant clone market, yet. IMO, that's a good thing. Clones don't save that much money (current PowerMac prices are comparable to clone Pentium prices) and create a huge number of headaches. > Bill Moyer <ttk@rahul.net> -- Regards, Joe Ragosta -- 100% Chemical and proud of it. Microsoft Network is prohibited from redistributing this work in any form, in whole or in part. Copyright, Joseph Ragosta, 1995. License to distribute this post is available to Microsoft for $1000. Posting without permission constitutes an agreement to these terms. Please send notices of violation to docjoe@interramp.com and Postmaster@microsoft.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<docjoe-1608950821470001@ip13.wilmington.de.interramp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ip13.wilmington.de.interramp.com!userReferences:
<stephenkDD9Ay3.H7D@netcom.com> <40ooq2$pm0@navajo.gate.net> <40or0h$15n6@navajo.gate.net> <40p4eo$qeo@caesar.ultra.net> <40pccd$61p@bug.rahul.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ip13.wilmington.de.interramp.com!user From: docjoe@interramp.com (Joe Ragosta) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600 Subject: Re: Prices and questions about direction of PPC hardware Date: 16 Aug 1995 12:20:53 GMT Organization: Graver Chemical Distribution: usa Message-ID: <docjoe-1608950821470001@ip13.wilmington.de.interramp.com> References: <stephenkDD9Ay3.H7D@netcom.com> <40ooq2$pm0@navajo.gate.net> <40or0h$15n6@navajo.gate.net> <40p4eo$qeo@caesar.ultra.net> <40pccd$61p@bug.rahul.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ip15.wilmington.de.interramp.com