Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #1157Re: Dream OS
From: Kazimir Kylheku
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 22:36
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 1995 22:36
21 lines
1368 bytes
1368 bytes
In article <40njuk$388@sundog.tiac.net>, Robert Krawitz <rlk@laraby.tiac.net> wrote: >The more widespread a particular encryption technology is, the more >vulnerable to attack. This should be part of the driver for a >particular class of filesystem. Not true. The more widespread a particular encryption technology is, the more people have a chance to poke holes in it, and the more chance you have of finding out about a weakness before you are affected by it. One of the reasons you can trust PGP is that the source code is freely and widely distributed, and is the subject of scrutiny by encryption experts. If one-time pads became a "widespread encryption technology", would you lose confidence in them? -- Finger c2a192@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca for PGP public key. Or contact one of the public key servers -- the key id is 0xD3C7995D.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<40tru8INN42o@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mailReferences:
<40njuk$388@sundog.tiac.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca!not-for-mail From: c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600 Subject: Re: Dream OS Date: 16 Aug 1995 15:36:56 -0700 Organization: Computer Science, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C., Canada Message-ID: <40tru8INN42o@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> References: <40njuk$388@sundog.tiac.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca