🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <418taj$ro2@decaxp.harvard.edu>,
David Yeh <dyeh@fas.harvard.edu> wrote:
>Mad Max (poulosio@netcom.com) wrote:
>: So, how many intellegent AOLers are there? The fact you defend AOL and 
>: have an AOL email address in your .sig kills your credibility. If AOL is 
>: so great, then why did you post from an ISP? Personally, anyone willing 
>: to put up with iron-fisted censorship that enforces misspelling of half 
>: the dictionary has to be bloody stupid.
>
>ok, I have no aol account so maybe i am more "credible."  do you know
>any aol users personally, and do you really really think *all* of them
>are idiots?  i know about six personally, and i would consider them all


While I don't want to stereotype an entire subset of the net-user
community, my personal experience is that AOL is short for A**hOLe.
This is experience not just with c.s.m.a. but also other news-groups
that I frequent.  My postings usually don't attract flames on the net; 
AOLers send me emails with foul language in reply to what I've written.

-arun gupta