🚀 go-pugleaf

In <rmcassid-2108951156010001@dante.eng.uci.edu> rmcassid@uci.edu (Robert Cassidy) writes:

>In article <417pv7$qp7@steel.interlog.com>, daveacg@interlog.com (Dave
>Glue) wrote:
>
>> William Taylor <wwtaylor@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> 
>> From "long" experience?  Amazing, considering the things not even out
>> yet.  95's weakness is not complete memory protection, and yet you
>> advocate the Mac, which is far worse in that area?
>
>'95 is not out yet? 400,000 people would disagree with you on that.

None of them is running a fully supported, production version, of Win 95,
however.  Beta, preview, etc versions have been released for a _very_
long time, since the days when everybody used to call it Chicago.

>> And that "simple" HAL is the main reason Copland will be out in a
>> year, not in a month.  Hardly an easy task at all.
>
>That simple HAL was nearly implemented by half a dozen guys in Switzerland
>in a few months. Copland is a *lot* more than HAL.

Injecting pure vapour in a discussion is a standard practice for any
self-respecting advocate.  What is "nearly implemented" supposed to mean,
BTW?

Dan 
--
Dan Pop
CERN, CN Division
Email: Dan.Pop@mail.cern.ch 
Mail:  CERN - PPE, Bat. 31 R-004, CH-1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland