Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #1678Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Warren H. Minix
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1995 23:08
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1995 23:08
11 lines
1162 bytes
1162 bytes
Ed, The original statement was correct. The 8088 was the cheapo chip, which was why the XT's and AT's followed so quickly. > I think I smell something here... The 8088 was a 16-bit machine and the > 8086 was the 8-bit machine that IBM wanted instead. The 386SX is better > Get off the drugs. > Edward
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Pine.A32.3.91.950825190300.22515A-100000@che.udel.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!che.udel.edu!minixReferences:
<3vrf2o$ffq@meaddata.meaddata.com> <3vtkg5$d0n@inews.sc.intel.com> <te-0608952033540001@mac1-d036a1.uwasa.fi> <stephenkDD9AGr.G0u@netcom.com> <pvdh.008b@motship.xs4all.nl> <edodge-2508951459220001@ip-pdx6-51.teleport.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!che.udel.edu!minix From: "Warren H. Minix" <minix@che.udel.edu> Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: Fri, 25 Aug 1995 19:08:11 -0400 Organization: University of Delaware Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.950825190300.22515A-100000@che.udel.edu> References: <3vrf2o$ffq@meaddata.meaddata.com> <3vtkg5$d0n@inews.sc.intel.com> <te-0608952033540001@mac1-d036a1.uwasa.fi> <stephenkDD9AGr.G0u@netcom.com> <pvdh.008b@motship.xs4all.nl> <edodge-2508951459220001@ip-pdx6-51.teleport.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: che.udel.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <edodge-2508951459220001@ip-pdx6-51.teleport.com>