Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #175Re: floppy eject buttons [was: What's a Real Computer?]
From: Dan Pop
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 12:43
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 12:43
53 lines
2756 bytes
2756 bytes
In <DCM2z5.9Ex@nntpa.cb.att.com> gupta@mrspock.mt.att.com (Arun Gupta) writes: >In article <danpop.807226875@rscernix>, Dan Pop <Dan.Pop@mail.cern.ch> wrote: >> >>I did all this switching on the Unix side. Sorry to disappoint you, >>but I never read any documentation for elm and pine. They're menu driven, >>you know? My Unix tutorial book has a chapter about vi which contains >>everything I needed to know about it and emacs is menu driven. An > >One of the following must be true : > 1. You need very little from vi. Don't think so. I'm using it right now, since it's my preferred editor for non-programming work. > 2. You had a very good UNIX tutorial book This is the true one. > 3. You are unaware of about a million features of vi. I am aware of vi's features, even of those I don't know how to use without opening a book, because I need them once or twice a year. > >>application doesn't need a GUI in order to be easy to use. This explains >>why the ASCII terminals haven't been killed yet by the PC's, Mac's, >>workstations and X terminals. BTW, their worst "enemy" here is the >>X terminal. > >IMO, ASCII terminals haven't been killed yet at least in part, because they >consume the least bandwidth of the various display solutions, and bandwidth >is still very expensive. Nope. They survive because they're adequate for their jobs. $0 administration overhead, low maintenance costs, they don't become obsolete in a couple of years. These are all major advantages for those who don't need more capabilities than a terminal can provide. >I agree with you that an application doesn't need a GUI in order to be >easy to use. What it needs is consistency with the other suite of applications >that the user is likely to use and be familiar with. Nowadays, terminals are typically used for running a single application (on many of them you can see this in the burnt phosphor). Few people are still using them for software development, except those working on IBM mainframes. Dan -- Dan Pop CERN, CN Division Email: Dan.Pop@mail.cern.ch Mail: CERN - PPE, Bat. 31 R-004, CH-1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<danpop.807281008@rscernix>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!CERN.ch!rscernix!danpopReferences:
<DCM2z5.9Ex@nntpa.cb.att.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!CERN.ch!rscernix!danpop From: Dan.Pop@mail.cern.ch (Dan Pop) Subject: Re: floppy eject buttons [was: What's a Real Computer?] X-Nntp-Posting-Host: ues5.cern.ch Message-ID: <danpop.807281008@rscernix> Sender: news@news.cern.ch (USENET News System) Organization: CERN European Lab for Particle Physics X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #9 (NOV) References: <DCM2z5.9Ex@nntpa.cb.att.com> Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 12:43:28 GMT