Re: Microsoft

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc

Article #184

#184

From: wayne roberts
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 14:00

8 lines
842 bytes

>jah@rrnet.com (John Hjelmstad) writes:
>
>	Actually. . . After 100MHz, MHz is no longer an accurate form of 
>measurement. . .
>Uh? What would you rather prefer?

Mhz is a frequency measurement, million cycles per second.
Although when your above 1,000Mhz you'd want to say 1Ghz.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <milcomDCMxKw.54A@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!milcom

References:

<isisDAy25H.L21@netcom.com> <DC58Fu.ALC@wombat.hanse.de> <3uue4fINNkvc@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <DCJu69.7KG@wombat.hanse.de>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!milcom
From: milcom@netcom.com (wayne roberts)
Subject: Re: Microsoft
Message-ID: <milcomDCMxKw.54A@netcom.com>
Organization: netcom online communications
References: <isisDAy25H.L21@netcom.com> <DC58Fu.ALC@wombat.hanse.de> <3uue4fINNkvc@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <DCJu69.7KG@wombat.hanse.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 14:00:32 GMT
Sender: milcom@netcom10.netcom.com

Reply to Parent Message