🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <42ds6l$69p@sloth.swcp.com>, "Harlan W. Stockman"
<hwstock@swcp.com> wrote:

[snip]
> However, I think it is 
> important to recommend your honesty to your CEO, so he can appreciate your 
> altruistic bent in ignoring the OS that commands about 90% of the market.


Say what?

Ninety per cent! Yet another delusional post from a Wintel user. Window
3.x has less than 60% of the desktop O/S market. Win95 has close to *zero*
per cent.

In any case, I think you completely missed the point of the article,
Harlan. It clearly is *not* altruism that motivates either the writer or
his employer from possibly dropping support for Win95 - it is economic
necessity. They are apparently coming to the conclusion that the return
from Win95 product development (at least for the  TCP/IP-based product he
was referring to) does not justify the excessive development costs of
same.

-- 
Don Andrachuk
DEA Systems