Re: Debate: PowerMac

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc

Article #2009

#2009

From: Joel Sartoris
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 1995 19:56

15 lines
1116 bytes

>
Jason Newquist (newquist@maxwell.ucdavis.edu) wrote:
> For certain applications, yeah, Apple creams.  But until Copland, 
> system-level performance is going to be a patchwork.  That's not bad
> Win95 is far worse a patchwork then Apple could ever purposefully
>design 
> -- it's just not the decisive advantage Apple needs to toss happily
>in  the face of win bigots.

With all the system crashes experienced with the current test version
of Copland, you may be a bit disappointed with the initial release, as
are many PC users with the initial release of Win95.  Of course by the
time Copland is released, Win96 will probably be ready :)  .

--Joel Sartoris

Technical Details

Message-ID: <42kudt$409@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews

References: <ckollerDEHxK9.H7t@netcom.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews
From: jsart@ix.netcom.com (Joel Sartoris)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600
Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac
Date: 6 Sep 1995 19:56:45 GMT
Organization: Netcom
Message-ID: <42kudt$409@ixnews7.ix.netcom.com>
References: <ckollerDEHxK9.H7t@netcom.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-sf14-06.ix.netcom.com

Reply to Parent Message