Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #2125Re: Microsoft
From: David H. Goodlette
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 03:37
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 03:37
96 lines
5179 bytes
5179 bytes
James H. Rawlins (rawlins@cybernetics.net.net) wrote:
[my old stuff]
: PLEASE NOTE: THESE COSTS ARE OVERSTATED BY 20% to 100% IN SOME CASES.
: ALMOST ALL EXISTING APPLICATIONS WILL RUN WITH THE SAME
: FUNTIONALITY AS BEFORE. A NUMBER OF UPGRADES ARE FREE.
: CHECK WITH HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE VENDORS FOR THE REAL COSTS
: INVOLVED.
[more of my old stuff]
: PLEASE NOTE: IF YOU INSTALL LINUX, ALL OF YOUR CURRENT APPLICATIONS WILL
: BECOME WORTHLESS. FINDING EQUIVALENT REPLACEMENTS WILL BE
: DIFFICULT OR NONEXISTENT. IN ALL CASES THE CHOICES WILL BE
: DRAMATICALLY REDUCED.
[more stuff]
: Yes. Why did you post such absurd upgrade costs. Costs are not an
: "opinion". Why did you leave out the real costs involved in
: switching to Linux? It appears to me, that your intent is to
: deceive. I hope I am mistaken about that. It is wrong to provide
: such misinformation to people. If you want me to use Linux, be
: honest about what would be involved. Tell me the advantages and the
: disadvantages. Tell me what you like about it not what you dislike
: about another OS. By giving me such obviously inaccurate information,
: I have to wonder, what else am I not being told?
: __________________________________
: Jim Rawlins
: rawlins@cybernetics.net
: Charlotte, NC
: __________________________________
My answer:
As I POSTED CLEARLY, my figures were my OPINION. I base them on
prior experience over time.
You are absolutely correct: most of your existing software will run
as is; you may not get the 32 bit capability inherent in Win95
(at least, not immmediately). You WILL have to go to 16 MB and a
big (>500MB) hard drive if you want decent performance from the
same box.
I did overestimate *some* costs, in an effort not to underestimate.
perhaps I overestimated too much. I know for a fact that the upgrade
from Virtual C/C++ 1.0 to 2 was $145.95, including a third party
DOS extender. I know for a fact that the upgrade for Borland C/C++ 4.5
from Borland C/C++ 4.0 was 149.95. I *suspect* MS-Foxpro is also
^^^^^^
^^^^^^
149.95 for an upgrade from 2.6 to 3.0. Ad nauseum. I was not
aware of any free upgrades; you may very well be correct.
To be fair, these upgrades did not necessarily coincide with my
hardware purchase; I try to keep all my professional software
upgraded to the best of my pocket book's ability. I spent in
excess of $2000.00 alone on software upgrades. I know that
from my tax records.
I'm making the assumption that at least some individuals have more
than just the basic set of software; I have MS-Office, MS-C/C++, Borland
C/C++, Zortech C/C++, MS-Foxpro, MS-Access PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPERS
EDITION, not the trimmed down shit you get on the Office CD, MS-Project
4.0, 386-Max (not needed for Win95 I think), and a host of driver
software for the scanner, Read-write optical, tape drive, etc.
As to advantages and disadvantages of Linux: Please read my post
"Why I like linux", on comp.os.linux.advocacy. In it I detail my
current viewpoint of Linux as compared to other OS's. To summarize:
- Linux recognized ALL of my reasonably state-of-the-art hardware with
NO problems once properly configured. ESIX (an SVR4 distribution)
did not.
- Linux never wrote to my pertiton table until I told it to.
Contrasted to Windows NT, where it overwrote my partition
table and required me to reinstall all of DOS and OS/2 AFTER
I had to buy OS/2 Warp 3.0 in order to change the partition table
(Windows NT was incompatible with OS/2 2.11)
- OS/2 Warp 3.0 MODIFIED my existing Windows 3.1 executable, patching
it for its own DOS extender WITHOUT GIVING ME an option to override
this decision.
I will endeavor to be more accurate in the future. Thank you.
--
Dave (Goodbits) Goodlette dhg@goodco.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Trust nothing as Gospel unless straight from God. In that case,
be sure to check His ID.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<432va9$2gq@news-2.csn.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bits.goodco.com!dhgReferences:
<isisDAy25H.L21@netcom.com> <3t147l$btu@dingo.cc.uq.oz.au> <3t15gs$1qa@parsifal.nando.net> <3t1al6$e2o@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <3tcp49$6l7@selway.umt.edu> <42o43o$d4b@inferno.mpx.com.au> <42qjqj$kbc@news-2.csn.net> <42sltm$f7s@ralph.vnet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bits.goodco.com!dhg From: dhg@goodco.com (David H. Goodlette) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft Subject: Re: Microsoft Followup-To: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft Date: 12 Sep 1995 03:37:45 GMT Organization: GoodCO: Forensic Software Specialists Message-ID: <432va9$2gq@news-2.csn.net> References: <isisDAy25H.L21@netcom.com> <3t147l$btu@dingo.cc.uq.oz.au> <3t15gs$1qa@parsifal.nando.net> <3t1al6$e2o@vixen.cso.uiuc.edu> <3tcp49$6l7@selway.umt.edu> <42o43o$d4b@inferno.mpx.com.au> <42qjqj$kbc@news-2.csn.net> <42sltm$f7s@ralph.vnet.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.117.15.13 X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]