🚀 go-pugleaf

Nevin ":-]" Liber (nevin@CS.Arizona.EDU) wrote:
: In article <19950909.11F9BC0.149FC@olympus.net>, dons@olympus.net (Don
: Schmelling) wrote:
: 
: > NO, NO, NO, NO!!  I said if you do not like the information I give you
: > then look it up in a computer science book,
: 
: Which one?  If this, your unsubstantiated claim of PMT being The One And
: Only Way To Do True Multitasking, is so fundamentally important to
: computing and computer science, there ought to be hundreds if not
: thousands of sources of this information.  Yet, you can't seem to cite
: even *one* (other than a few anecdotes from your professors, who for some
: strange reason haven't bothered to publish this revelation).  As the OS
: expert you want us to believe that you are, it ought to be trivial for you
: to pull half a dozen books or journals from your bookshelf backing up your
: wild claims.  So, are you going to cite some published, respected sources,
: or just keep spouting BS trying to mislead us about why you can't (some of
: your other options are either admitting you are wrong or just to stop
: posting on subjects you really don't know about, but I don't see either
: happening any time soon)?
You may not find it in any computer science resource.  But ask the
people that teach the computer science classes.  Every single one I have
talked to has said the same thing.  That CMT is not multitasking becuase
it does not switch tasks quickly enough.  There are some computer science
profs who will cliam that CMT is indeed multitasking, but they are in
the minority reguardless of your claims.  The reason that you will be
hard pressed to find a unfavorable remark about CMT in a text book is that
so many computers still use it.  This angle of your does nothing to prove
anything about wether CMT is multitasking or not.  All this approach shows
is that you use faulty logic.
I do not mislead people.  I could not even mislead people as eloquantly as you.
I have yet to see you site any published respected sources to back up your
misleading opinion either.
: 
: > and take some os classes and
: > you will have all the definitons you need.
: 
: Funny, I can't find anyone besides Usenet and the Unix community and you
: who is willing to define PMT as The One And Only Way To Do True
: Multitasking.  None of these are exactly unbiased or even respected
: sources.
: 
: > I did not say anything about my education or your education or anyones
: > educatin.
: 
: Bullshit.  As you said in earlier messages:
: 
: 1> I would expect someone with an email address that ends in .edu to
: 1> be more sensible than this.
: 
: 2> If you do not like my proof then go get a BSCS degree and talk to me then.
Again, this says nothing about education reread the posts.
: 
: It sure looks like you are implying that I don't already have a BSCS.  If
: you weren't, to use your words (see the unnumbered quote above, complete
: with your typing errors, to show that I am not twisting your words; simply
: using them), saying anything about (or, to use my words, putting down) my
: education, what the hell were you talking about?
It may look this way in your twisted mind but that means little to me.
: 
: > Now you are twisting my words around
: 
: Twisting your words around?  By doing what, besides *repeating* them??  I
: can't help it if you keep posting things that are contradictory to each
: other.
Twisting my words around is exactly what you are doing.
: 
: > and acussing me of using the same
: > tactics you use.
: 
: Don't flatter yourself.  I try to be overt and upfront and present a
: consistent stance; you've done none of these things, and it shows.
hahahahahahahahaaaaa.  You have never been consistant or upfront.
You also seem to think that using words like bullshit or BS will
make your words more eloquant.

-------------------------------------
Don Schmelling   Port Angeles, WA USA
    A1200/540/CD + A1230 50/50/8
           OMNIA EXTARES
-------------------------------------