🚀 go-pugleaf

In message 224$llp@cdn_mail.dn.itg.telecom.com.au> - Thunder@lightning.bolt wri
tes:
:>
:>In <43b224$llp@cdn_mail.dn.itg.telecom.com.au>, tbarham@vcrpmap.telecom.com.au (Tim Barham) writes:
:>>In article <1995Sep13.191421.10924@scala.scala.com>,
:>>   dave.haynie@scala.com (Dave Haynie) wrote:
:>>
:>>> In <42qjqj$kbc@news-2.csn.net>, dhg@goodco.com (David H. Goodlette)
:>>> writes:
:>>>
:>>> > Tonio Loewald (tonio@jolt.mpx.com.au) wrote:
:>>> >
:>>> > > and a fair bit on after sales support, etc. The big money will be in
:>>> > > selling Office 95 and replacements for all the other things that
:>>> >           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:>>> > > won't work quite right until you upgrade.
:>>>
:>>> Sure. Microsoft plans it that way, and uses existing upgrades and new
:>>> systems as a lever to force more upgrades, in business at least. So
:>>> here I am, let's say I put Windows 95 on my system. Now, strangely
:>>> enough, Word for Windows 3.1 is acting flakey (ok, flakier than
:>>> normal).
:>>
:>>Hmmm, Dave, are you talking from experience here? I don't think so. For the 
:>>months that I have been using Win95, I've not had a single problem with any 
:>>Microsoft product - Word, Excel etc (non Windows 95 versions) all work 
:>>fine.
:>
:>Well, actually, if you want some examples, Adobe Photoshop 3.0 doesn't work 
:>correctly under Win95 and neither does the Win3.1 version of MS Money.  Sorry
                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
:>to bust your bubble....

If this is true it's interesting since MS was giving away MS Money for windows
free with each purchase of Win95.  But how come that wouldn't surprise me? ;-)

Gregory    Team OS/2