🚀 go-pugleaf

In <43lcsi$1m9@cyberE.creative.net> aali@creative.net@creative.net
writes: 
>
>In <43k6m0$m3e@toon.ctp.com>, pdrap@ctp.com (Patrick Draper) writes:
>>drj@peak.org (David Jenkinson) wrote:
>>
>>>In article <tonyn-0109950144230001@tonyn.tiac.net>, tonyn@tiac.net
says...
>>>>Deterministic real-time processing is difficult to do with
interrupts. 
>>>>You really can't tell when all the interrupts will stack up at the
same
>>>>time, causing the lowest priority interrupt to wait a long time. 
Coupled
>>>>with the overhead of context switching, this makes interrupt-driven
>>
>><<<snip>>>
>>
>>>Who the hell do you think is going to understand this bullshit? 
Geez, dude, 
>>>you should get a part on star trek.  You do excellent techo-babble.
>>
>>I understand it perfectly. But then again, you may not be the captain
of
>>your own starship like I am.
>>
>>
>> /\/\ |Patrick Draper                        Mr. Order, he runs at a|
>>/ /_.\|Cambridge Technology Partners, Inc.      good pace, but old  |
>>\  /./|e-mail: pdrap@ctp.com                      Mother chaos is   |
>> \/\/ |Amsterdam, The Netherlands                 winning the race. |
>>
>What sort of dimwit would be perusing this newsgroup without a basic
understanding
>of terms as simple as deterministic-real time processing, and context
switching??
>Probably some retard wanna be jock that has finally learned where the
on switch is
>on a computer and hunts and pecks to make his "grand" statements.  Get
a clue
>Turkey, the age of the computer elite is upon us.  Either cope, adapt,
evolve or DIE!!
>
>Ali


AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!