Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #2381Re: Ask yourself these before you choosing a 32bit OS...
From: Mark Strand
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 07:22
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 07:22
65 lines
3319 bytes
3319 bytes
In article <447bbc$gfo@bud.shadow.net>, benny@shadow.net says... > > >Distribution: > >mmalcolm Crawford (m.crawford@dcs.shef.ac.uk) wrote: >: Kevin Brown (kcbrown@starfruit.csd.sgi.com) wrote: > >: >By the time PC-class >: >hardware was beefy enough to run NeXTStep, it was too late: Microsoft >: >had captured most of the market with Windows and managed to get it >: >past the point where compatibility is everything. >: > >: Umm, Sean Luke missed out on saying that "This is an odd observation from an >: SGI chap..." >: :-) > >: What's interesting is that in the interim the rest of the Unix manufacturers >: had still not got their acts together to try to take on Micro$oft. Now it >: appears that about the only chance many have of salvation-through- >: unification in the face of the Window$ onslaught is either NEXTSTEP running >: natively on their hardware (HP, Sun -- of course NEXTSTEP also runs on Intel >: PCs), or through implementations of OpenStep on their own OS (Sun, DEC -- >: note of course that NeXT is also porting OpenStep to Window$95 and Window$ >: NT). > >: OK, so I exaggerate, but it's not clear to me how Unix will survive if it >: doesn't unite behind *something* in order to try to deliver on some of the >: promises of "Open systems" made a couple of years ago, and the best >: something that there is is NEXTSTEP, and fortunately it's in almost all the >: right places(*). Now if only SGI would accept a port to their hardware (if >: only to keep Cambridge Animation happy! :-) > >: (*) NeXT is placing bets on M$ too, though, as I mentioned above (OpenStep >: Window$95/NT)... this makes it a bit of a double-edged sword as far as the >: Unix manufacturers go, albeit a very sharp one! > >: Have fun, > >: mmalc. > >yeah.. if anyone can afford the price of NEXTSTEP. Its a nice O/S but its >way overpriced. > Compared to what? Warp or 95? Sure. Compared to other commercial-grade UNIX or other operating systems? Not really. In the same ballpark as NT for pricing ($795 for NS vs. about $350 or so for NT). And NS never has been for the kid who buys his OS at best buy for $79.99, but rather for the kind of corporations that don't blink at what NS costs. Of the people who aren't using NeXTSTEP, I'd guess there is a very small minority who want it but can't afford it. Most people have never seen it, or refuse to abandon their beloved Windows for (*gasp*) something different.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<44difn$3v3@insosf1.netins.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.netins.net!usenetReferences:
<3vh2hc$9dd@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> <nevin-0309950108480001@mac-nevin.cs.arizona.edu> <DEJ81J.2JK@frobozz.sccsi.com> <nevin-0809950319040001@mac-nevin.cs.arizona.edu> <42r7qq$5kb@starfruit.csd.sgi.com> <42stfp$hqq@hecate.umd.edu> <950910225443.1164 <447bbc$gfo@bud.shadow.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.netins.net!usenet From: marks@netins.net (Mark Strand) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.next.advocacy Subject: Re: Ask yourself these before you choosing a 32bit OS... Date: 28 Sep 1995 07:22:30 GMT Organization: INS Info Services, Des Moines, IA, USA Message-ID: <44difn$3v3@insosf1.netins.net> References: <3vh2hc$9dd@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> <nevin-0309950108480001@mac-nevin.cs.arizona.edu> <DEJ81J.2JK@frobozz.sccsi.com> <nevin-0809950319040001@mac-nevin.cs.arizona.edu> <42r7qq$5kb@starfruit.csd.sgi.com> <42stfp$hqq@hecate.umd.edu> <950910225443.1164 <447bbc$gfo@bud.shadow.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: s094.netins.net Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.11