🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #2381

Re: Ask yourself these before you choosing a 32bit OS...

#2381
From: Mark Strand
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 07:22
65 lines
3319 bytes
In article <447bbc$gfo@bud.shadow.net>, benny@shadow.net says...
>
>
>Distribution: 
>
>mmalcolm Crawford (m.crawford@dcs.shef.ac.uk) wrote:
>: Kevin Brown (kcbrown@starfruit.csd.sgi.com) wrote:
>
>: >By the time PC-class
>: >hardware was beefy enough to run NeXTStep, it was too late: Microsoft
>: >had captured most of the market with Windows and managed to get it
>: >past the point where compatibility is everything.
>: >
>: Umm, Sean Luke missed out on saying that "This is an odd observation from 
an
>: SGI chap..."
>: :-)
>
>: What's interesting is that in the interim the rest of the Unix 
manufacturers
>: had still not got their acts together to try to take on Micro$oft.  Now 
it
>: appears that about the only chance many have of salvation-through-
>: unification in the face of the Window$ onslaught is either NEXTSTEP 
running
>: natively on their hardware (HP, Sun -- of course NEXTSTEP also runs on 
Intel
>: PCs), or through implementations of OpenStep on their own OS (Sun, DEC --
>: note of course that NeXT is also porting OpenStep to Window$95 and 
Window$
>: NT).
>
>: OK, so I exaggerate, but it's not clear to me how Unix will survive if it
>: doesn't unite behind *something* in order to try to deliver on some of 
the
>: promises of "Open systems" made a couple of years ago, and the best
>: something that there is is NEXTSTEP, and fortunately it's in almost all 
the
>: right places(*).  Now if only SGI would accept a port to their hardware 
(if
>: only to keep Cambridge Animation happy! :-)
>
>: (*) NeXT is placing bets on M$ too, though, as I mentioned above 
(OpenStep
>: Window$95/NT)... this makes it a bit of a double-edged sword as far as 
the
>: Unix manufacturers go, albeit a very sharp one!
>
>: Have fun,
>
>: mmalc.
>
>yeah.. if anyone can afford the price of NEXTSTEP. Its a nice O/S but its 
>way overpriced.
>

Compared to what? Warp or 95? Sure. Compared to other commercial-grade
UNIX or other operating systems? Not really. In the same ballpark as
NT for pricing ($795 for NS vs. about $350 or so for NT). And NS never
has been for the kid who buys his OS at best buy for $79.99, but rather
for the kind of corporations that don't blink at what NS costs.

Of the people who aren't using NeXTSTEP, I'd guess there is a very small
minority who want it but can't afford it. Most people have never seen it,
or refuse to abandon their beloved Windows for (*gasp*) something different.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <44difn$3v3@insosf1.netins.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.netins.net!usenet
References: <3vh2hc$9dd@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> <nevin-0309950108480001@mac-nevin.cs.arizona.edu> <DEJ81J.2JK@frobozz.sccsi.com> <nevin-0809950319040001@mac-nevin.cs.arizona.edu> <42r7qq$5kb@starfruit.csd.sgi.com> <42stfp$hqq@hecate.umd.edu> <950910225443.1164 <447bbc$gfo@bud.shadow.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.netins.net!usenet
From: marks@netins.net (Mark Strand)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.next.advocacy
Subject: Re: Ask yourself these before you choosing a 32bit OS...
Date: 28 Sep 1995 07:22:30 GMT
Organization: INS Info Services, Des Moines, IA, USA
Message-ID: <44difn$3v3@insosf1.netins.net>
References: <3vh2hc$9dd@falcon.ccs.uwo.ca> <nevin-0309950108480001@mac-nevin.cs.arizona.edu> <DEJ81J.2JK@frobozz.sccsi.com> <nevin-0809950319040001@mac-nevin.cs.arizona.edu> <42r7qq$5kb@starfruit.csd.sgi.com> <42stfp$hqq@hecate.umd.edu> <950910225443.1164 <447bbc$gfo@bud.shadow.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: s094.netins.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.11