Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #2427Re: structure for BeBox Usenet newsgroup - suggestion
From: Martin Frankel
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 22:38
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 1995 22:38
16 lines
1061 bytes
1061 bytes
FIFTEEN newsgroups for a box that isn't even being sold yet??? Oh PLEASE. All the traffic I've seen would fall under just one of those groups. "comp.sys.be.advocacy". If the BeBox has this many advocates sight unseen, I can only imagine what will happen in January. Like I said in another thread, let's just get comp.sys.be and go from there. With a young system you want as much cross-pollenation between different application areas as possible. You don't want to split things up. -- Martin Frankel mdf@sgi.com Silicon Graphics, Inc. (415)933-6191
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<461b8e$lni@fido.asd.sgi.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!fido.asd.sgi.com!bluedini!mdfReferences:
<dakkon-1510951042410001@stemmons33.onramp.net> <146926@cup.portal.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!fido.asd.sgi.com!bluedini!mdf From: mdf@bluedini.asd.sgi.com (Martin Frankel) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.next.advocacy Subject: Re: structure for BeBox Usenet newsgroup - suggestion Date: 17 Oct 1995 22:38:06 GMT Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. Mountain View, CA Message-ID: <461b8e$lni@fido.asd.sgi.com> References: <dakkon-1510951042410001@stemmons33.onramp.net> <146926@cup.portal.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: bluedini.asd.sgi.com