🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <dom.781.000DE99C@i-cubed.demon.co.uk>,
Dom <dom@i-cubed.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <30844D41.74FD@mts.se> Martin Nisshagen <martin@mts.se> writes:
>>David Ludwig wrote:
>>> newquist@maxwell.ucdavis.edu (Jason Newquist) wrote:
>>> >       comp.sys.be.advocacy
>>> >       comp.sys.be.hardware
>>> >       comp.sys.be.system
>>> >       comp.sys.be.applications
>>> >       comp.sys.be.development (or .programming)
>>> These groups should be added as well.
>>> comp.sys.be.announce
>>> comp.sys.be.misc
>>> comp.sys.be.networking
>>comp.sys.be.realtime
>>comp.sys.be.setup
>>comp.sys.be.multimedia
>>comp.sys.be.chrp (for running a CHRP compliant OS on Be)
>>comp.sys.be.admin
>>comp.sys.be.pre-release (for betas of future Be:s and it's softw)
>>comp.sys.be.graphics
>
>So let's get these groups set up quick. Also:
>comp.sys.be.audio
>comp.sys.be.linux-heads
>??
comp.sys.be.unix.linux
comp.sys.be.unix.bsd.free
comp.sys.be.unix.bsd.net
comp.sys.be.unix.bsd.i
comp.sys.be.amiga
comp.sys.be.next
comp.sys.be.dcom.telecom.modems.14-4
comp.sys.be.barney.dinosaur.high-school.dances

err....

I think we should just have comp.sys.be

*If* the traffic gets heavy there, we should split... later.

I mean, I think a separate usenet newsgroup for every single 
employee over at Be would be rather excessive.

I mean, the BeBox is the most exciting thing to happen to computer
technology in 10 years, but I think we are getting a little carried away. 


-- 
Copyright 1995 Sam Trenholme.  Microsoft Network is prohibited from 
redistributing this work in any form, in whole or in part.  License to 
distribute this post is available to Microsoft for $1000.  Posting without 
permission constitutes an agreement to these terms.  Any network provider not
owned or funded in whole or in part by Microsoft may use this message freely.