🚀 go-pugleaf

>This proposal will NOT be allowed to come to a vote (ie. a CFV) unless you
>go back to square one and begin again, this time following the published
>procedures.  You can find those procedures in this newsgroup.  Look for
>an article titled "How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup".

I do not think that the creation of the comp.sys.be newsgroup sould be 
delayed one week because of a simple typographical error. Considering the 
volume of postings in comp.sys.powerpc and other newsgroups on the Be 
computer, cluttering the newsgroup for people who do not wish to read 
about the BeBox, I think a newsgroup should be formed as soon as 
possible. I think the CFV should reflect the fact that a simple human 
mistake was ade, but a mistake that, IMHO, should not delay the creation 
of a comp.sys.be newsgroup.

If a large percentage of people find objection with this, and give *valid*
objections, I will post a RFD in the appropriate newsgroups myself.

Perhaps I could go over to alt.config and see if we can get an alt.sys.be 
real fast, so we have someplace to post until comp.sys.be (or comp.os.be, 
it really makes no difference) comes into being.

-- 
 __ Any opinions expressed in this message are strictly my own, not LLNL's
|  )  __  Jean-Louis Gassée has the courage to define tomorrow's computer.
|-<  /__) see http://www.be.com -- http://www.ifi.uio.no/~stigo/bebox.html
|__) \__  Sam Trenholme <set@oryx.llnl.gov> --- Just another BeBox fanatic