Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #2494Re: structure for BeBox Usenet newsgroup - suggestion
From: Andreas Mixich
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 13:11
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 13:11
16 lines
1435 bytes
1435 bytes
krishna@primenet.com (Glenn Saunders) schrieb am 18.10.1995 : GS> Don't you think this is premature? ONE .alt (or maybe a comp.sys.be.misc) GS> group would probably be enough for now for a machine that isn't even out GS> yet. Starting up a zillion subgroups is going to lead to a zillion GS> low-traffic groups. So what ? I don't understand all these discussions.....There will be a new system, which sooner or later will need all its belonging groups. So why not creating them now ? Why wait and waste bandwith with any future RfD ? I mena this is the ideal point to set up all needed groups, why do you want to wait ? If the BeBox fails one just have to clear these groups. Won't be too difficult, will it ? Bye, Andreas HUMPTY@TOMATE.TNG.OCHE.DE
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<wjPQnMD0aez4@0humpty.tomate.tng.oche.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.tng.oche.de!tomate.tng.oche.deReferences:
<dakkon-1510951042410001@stemmons33.onramp.net> <4623vu$i5s@nnrp3.news.primenet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.next.advocacy References: <dakkon-1510951042410001@stemmons33.onramp.net> <4623vu$i5s@nnrp3.news.primenet.com> X-Newsreader: MicroDot 1.10 [UNREGISTRIERT] Mime-version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-encoding: 8B Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!news.tng.oche.de!tomate.tng.oche.de X-Gateway: ZCONNECT UE utomate.tng.oche.de.tomate.tng.oche.de [PolyNet zTOr V4.9 Serie: "light"] Subject: Re: structure for BeBox Usenet newsgroup - suggestion Message-ID: <wjPQnMD0aez4@0humpty.tomate.tng.oche.de> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 95 13:11:51 GMT From: Humpty@TOMATE.TNG.OCHE.DE (Andreas Mixich)