Re: Message passing speed on BeBox

Article View: comp.sys.powerpc

Article #2540

#2540

From: schillings benoit
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:55

9 lines
877 bytes

Actually with 2 CPU you can hope to reach better values than with a single
one... the reason is that you can have some balanced processed on both
sides which will not have to context switch at all... the message works
then like a mailbox between the two tasks... just difficult to achieve.

Kernel messages are very critical to our performance... we keep looking
for ways to improve it.

		-- Benoit

Technical Details

Message-ID: <benoitDI5x81.I26@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!benoit

References: <jazzDI1u41.16H@netcom.com> <dlakelan.816456084@isua1.iastate.edu> <jazzDI5Jrq.Bxt@netcom.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!netcom.com!benoit
From: benoit@netcom.com (schillings benoit)
Subject: Re: Message passing speed on BeBox
Message-ID: <benoitDI5x81.I26@netcom.com>
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <jazzDI1u41.16H@netcom.com> <dlakelan.816456084@isua1.iastate.edu> <jazzDI5Jrq.Bxt@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 1995 00:55:12 GMT
Sender: benoit@netcom3.netcom.com

Reply to Parent Message