🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4cgqr6$pk2@s-cwis.unomaha.edu>,
Issa El-Hazin <issa@cwis.unomaha.edu> wrote:
>christw@meaddata.com (Christopher C. Wood) writes:
>>I see.  A brand-new fully preemptive,
>Ahh ha.
>>protected-memory microkernal operating system 
> ----------------
>Sure, and pigs can fly.

Oh!  The piercing wit!  The keen insight that marks a true defender of 
Wintel!  I might as well give up now.

>>backward-compatible with todays' applications is
> -------------------------------
>
>Thanks for the laugh, keep'em coming.

Are you implying that Copland _won't_ be backwards-compatible?  From 
personal experience I've found that MacOS is far more 
backwards-compatible that Windoze.

>>"little new technology".  Whatever you say, cap'n.
>
>Geez, Windows 95 for the Mac in 1999. Why would you want that when
>you'll have a more robust NT then? Ahhhh, you guys hate Microsoft
>cause MacUser told you so. Live up to it, Apple will not have the
>best GUI OS for the masses anymore (at least not for long periods.) 

Actually, I hate Microsoft because it puts out poorly coded, half-assed 
excuses for real applications.  I hate it because I have to use Win 3.11 
at work, and it crashes at least once a day.  I hate it because I see a 
company thats ego has gotten in the way of quality.  And I hate it more 
because of small-minded fools such as yourself, who post little comments 
like 'Uh-huh' and 'Suuure.' and 'When pigs fly.' and think it 
constitutes a rational argument rather than realizing that it's little 
more than sandbox whining.

Jeff, sick of all the 'bigger dick' PC-Mac flamewars