🚀 go-pugleaf

>  And only marginally improved UI's are undesirable for most people
>  at the expense of being able to run their software reliably.  So
>  if you have to choose, anything that works is better than
>  anything that doesn't (my favorite restatement of Occam's Razor).

The assumption there being that the vast majority of users will
greatly benefit from Protected Memory schemes when they are
introduced. They won't: *programmers* will. To the end user, a
radical change in the way your machine multitasks your
applications or juggles your available RAM will be invisible. To
the end user, such changes are so close to completely invisible
that they hardly matter. Further, Occam's Razor aside, assuming
that *any* protected memory scheme will mean the end of viruses
or systemwide software crashes is in clear violation of my other
favorite law, Murphy's...