Article View: comp.sys.powerpc
Article #267Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....???
From: Joel Sartoris
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 23:43
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 23:43
20 lines
1182 bytes
1182 bytes
In <3vlv3n$8o0@nnrp3.primenet.com> english@primenet.com (Lawson English) writes: > >ON a 9500/132, the speed of SoftWIndows 2.0 beta running Windows 95 >Gold is said to rival that of an 80486DX2 33 [sic] system. > Ok, I'll bite... "Said" by whom? >Since SoftWIndows was *optimized* so that the emulator would be >bypassed for critical calls like GDI stuff, and since the beta system >of 2.0 probably isn't optimized for all WIndows 95 calls, this is >quite an interesting datum, IMHO. > Quite so, if it could be believed. If you haven't guessed, I'm seeking a citation, albeit somewhat skeptically. --Joel R. Sartoris
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3vme6q$pot@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix.netcom.com!netnewsReferences:
<3vli5j$1ha0@navajo.gate.net> <3vlv3n$8o0@nnrp3.primenet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: jsart@ix.netcom.com (Joel Sartoris) Newsgroups: comp.sys.powerpc,comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.sys.amiga.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,alt.2600,alt.destroy.microsoft Subject: Re: Debate: PowerMac "trounces" Pentium....??? Date: 1 Aug 1995 23:43:22 GMT Organization: Netcom Distribution: world Message-ID: <3vme6q$pot@ixnews3.ix.netcom.com> References: <3vli5j$1ha0@navajo.gate.net> <3vlv3n$8o0@nnrp3.primenet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-sf6-19.ix.netcom.com