🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <30ED06B8.2D83@mts.se>, Martin Nisshagen <martin@mts.se> wrote:

<snip>

> And an interpretation of that fact could be that the OS on the Mac still
> isn't much better than it was in '87. They have a long way to even come 
> close to some decent OSes like OS/2, NT, Unix, BeOS etc. And if they ever 
> will, I'm quite sure that You won't be able to run it on your old Mac II.
> 
> -- 
> Martin Nisshagen
> MTS Technology, Sweden
> martin@mts.se (MIME 1.0)

Some facts you have chosen to ignore:

1)  The OS of the Mac from '87 is still easier to use & more reliable than
Win95.

2)  The dialogue boxes that pop up in the Mac OS do not look like they
were written by Chinese graduate students,  unlike OS/who?

3)  Mac OS runs fine on 4MB of RAM on practically any Mac-computer while
WinNT needs pretty hefty hardware and beaucoup de memorie.

4)  Nobody who uses a home computer for "home computing" uses OS/w,  NT, 
UNiX,  or BeVaporware.

Thankyou,

Edward